Title

Safety and Efficacy Study of Betamarc to Treat Loss of Weight and Appetite in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Betamarc Plus Chemotherapy to Chemotherapy Alone in the Prevention and Treatment of CACS in Patients With Advanced NSCLC
  • Phase

    Phase 2
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Status

    Terminated
  • Intervention/Treatment

    betamarc ...
  • Study Participants

    70
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Betamarc is effective in improving the appetite and reversing weight loss in patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Study Started
Oct 31
2007
Primary Completion
Jun 30
2008
Study Completion
Aug 31
2008
Anticipated
Last Update
Jul 22
2008
Estimate

Drug Betamarc

2 tabs BID

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Newly diagnosed Stage IIIB or IV non-resectable NSCLC. Recurrent disease after resection for earlier stage disease is acceptable as long as patients are at least 6 months from surgery.
Treatment plan includes a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.
ECOG 0, 1 or 2.
Self-reported loss of body weight or anorexia.
Serum C-reactive protein ≥5 mg/L.
Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function.
Normal serum potassium.
Ability to comply with the study requirements and give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Known physical or functional obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract, malabsorption, intractable vomiting, uncontrollable diarrhea, concurrently receiving tube feeding or parenteral nutrition, or unable to swallow investigational drug product.
Concomitant therapy with an appetite stimulant.
History of poorly controlled hypertension or congestive heart failure.
Any implanted devices that could interfere with DXA scanning.
Prolongation of QT interval.
History of additional risk factors for torsades de pointe.
Concomitant therapy with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers) or ergot derivatives.
Females who are breast feeding, pregnant or of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control.
Any second malignancy which might confound the interpretation of safety or efficacy assessments.
Any condition which increases the patient's risk for participating in the study.
No Results Posted